August 4, 2006...9:47 am
Dissident Discipleship
I have been reading Dissident Discipleship by David Augsburger (Brazos Press, 2006). When I first selected this for my summer reading, I did so reluctantly thinking “just what the world needs ANOTHER discipleship book!” However, as I began to read last night, I was pleasantly surprised. Augsburger tackles the issue of following Christ from a moderate Anabaptist perspective. He begins with the broad idea of spirituality and proceeds to gently move to a genuine Christian worldview. To bring us to understanding of true spirituality in the sense of the gospel, Augsburger illustrates spirituality as monopolar, bipolar, and tripolar. He asserts that, “The emerging vision of spirituality in the twenty-first century is largely monopolar and exclusively subjective. It is centered in the spiritual nature of the person, in the person s essential humanity and core humanness. This monopolar dimension is universal to all humans and necessary to their humanity.” Augsburger defines Monopolar Spirituality as “the inner, subjective encounter with ones own inner universal self, with essential humaness that is reverent toward the uniqueness of the spiritual core that is universally present in all human beings. When respected, honored, expressed clearly, and realized more completely, it blossoms into the private inner experience of sacredness without sacred place, ritual, or tradition—of religiousness without formal religion.” Bipolar Spirituality “is both an inner, subjective experience of coming to know one’s true self and an objective experience of existence before God. It is the spirituality of a subjective, reflective life lived before the Transcendent, a life in search of and in compliance with the Divine.” Finally Tripolar Spirituality “possesses three dimensions: it is inwardly directed, upwardly compliant, and outwardly committed. The spirituality of personal transformation (the inner journey), the experience of divine encounter (the God-ward journey) and the relation of integrity and solidarity with the neighbor (the co-human journey with friend and enemy, with neighbor and persecutor) cannot be divided.”
Augsburger places these views of spirituality on a continum with modified views between each. He claims that Christidom has primarily found its place from 1.5 (modified Monopolar) to 2.5 (modified Bipolar) on the continum. He explains, “The position at 1.5 relates the self to a mirroring god who reflects the individual hopes, understandings, and often pretensions of the self. The mirroring god may indeed be an extension of the self as one prays to a being created in one’s own image. Type 2 recognizes a God who is Other and who makes divine demands that shape our lives. The benevolent-self position at 2.5 sees neighbor love as a desirable response of gratitude but not as essential to lived spirituality.”
I have just begun the journey through this book, but I believe Augsburger is fairly correct in his assertions at least based on my experience. While Christian community experiences are lived out differently everywhere, the focus in my realm was clearly in the Bipolar spirituality. My early teen and young adult church exposure was assimilation of truth to do “battle” with the enemy without much realization that the gospel had secured the victory.
18 Comments
August 4, 2006 at 11:57 pm
I just saw that this is on the textbook list for Bible Seminar…looks to be an interesting read. Can’t wait to check it out…
August 5, 2006 at 11:51 am
Rick
I’m sure will will have some great discussion with this book. I look forward to getting your (class) take on it. I believe it could be one of those books that we all are going to have to take time and reflect on what is being said with prayer and meditation in the Scriptures.
August 5, 2006 at 5:35 pm
Sounds like an interesting read. We don’t seem to think very deeply or theologically about discipleship. This book should be a help; I’ll have to get my copy. Thanks, Tony.
August 5, 2006 at 9:32 pm
I agree with you Dan, it seems many times we view discipleship in two facets: it is a product not a lifelong learning journey; also that it can be compartmentalized into only certain life experieces (personal relationships; family; church community) but not all of life. This is something I am coming to understand more clearly myself.
August 6, 2006 at 1:52 pm
Your comments re: your earlier church experience about gaining truth in order to do battle resonates with me as well. Apologetics in the light of the gospel’s far-reaching effects, brings His sovreignty in focus -it is not all about us being “Bible answer people” -it is the gospel permeating our lives in every way, before our brothers & sisters, and before a watching world. Thanks for the lead on a good read, Tony. Keep us posted as you continue this reading journey.
August 7, 2006 at 8:41 am
songchick, I think there are plenty of people from a certain era which thought that was the best way to live the gospel. They (most) certainly had good intentions, which is a daily signpost to me to beg God to keep me focused on authentic living of the truth. Some days are better than others
August 9, 2006 at 7:57 am
Mr. Abell,
Interesting thoughts. I am still trying to wrestle through some of the “pomo” language, so hang with me. Is Augsburger favoring the Tripolar Spirituality? If this is the case would he place differing degrees of importance upon the three different aspects related in his view? Or, are they all three co-equal (like a “polar-trinitarian spirituality”)? It would seem to me that an objective experience of existence before God would be the most important understanding, with the other two falling into place as a result. This is not to de-emphasize the others, but rather to try and wrap my mind around the logic of this thinking. I think that somewhere along the way the part of the church took this (objective biblical god-centeredness) and emphasized it at the expense of the other two points of emphasis in this post. Thus your experiences as a teen are not all that uncommon.
Paul S.
August 10, 2006 at 1:24 pm
Paul
Pomo language is a moving target so good luck with keeping up, I can’t keep up most the time myself. Augsburger makes a case in favor of Tripolar spirituality without any type of hierarchy of the three aspects. However, I am positive he is assuming an initial relationship with the Creator God as being essential and vital to discipleship. He explains it this way: “In tripolar spirituality, we come to know Christ through participation in the practices of discipleship that express love of others and result in practices of inner depth. These three-dimensional practices of everyday spirituality are worked out in many different ways…” He continues later by stating, “True spirituality is a spirituality of the road. We know him by following as we make the road by walking it, discover the way in obedient imitation, and participation in his life with us. I come to know myself truly as a spiritual being by knowing God. I come to know who I truly am by being known by God. I come to know others by seeing in them the reflected image of God, the Other. I come to know this Other when meeting God in others, sister, brother, neighbor, stranger, friend, or enemy.” Therefore, I believe Augsburger would only prioritize the initial relationship with Christ and after that all are equal (or should be).
August 11, 2006 at 8:36 am
Mr. Abell,
Thanks. I guess this proves that it is even worse than we thought to be bipolar. By the way I think you should make commenting on your blog a requirement for the BIOT (if it is on the schedule this semester) class. It could really help that hit counter move. Plus I want to hear what you guys are going through.
Paul
August 11, 2006 at 9:09 am
Interesting thought about BIOT, maybe I will do it. As for Augsburger, I am still trying to fully understand how his/Anabaptist position would work itself out in real life. 9/11 changed everything with regard to Augustinian “Just War Theory” IMHO. The “enemy” is not a country that you can go to and fight, but a belief system or philosophy. Israel in some regard will have to work through this w/Lebanon. Therefore, how does the underlying theory of Tripolar Spirituality work itself out in the Anabaptist tradition of pacifism? I am discovering a lot of questions…so I keep reading, studying, and praying.
September 21, 2006 at 8:48 pm
Recently I have been thinking through “Christian” ethics, in anticipation of teaching a course this Spring. For those of you who have read “Dissident Discipleship,” would you say that this book contributes to a starting point for “Christian” ethics? I want to teach ethics and work through the issues in a way that is thoroughly gospel oriented. What does this book teach us about how we should live “ethically”? Any thoughts?
September 24, 2006 at 4:35 pm
Dan - I don’t know if it is a starting point for Christian ethics, but it is certainly foundational to the book. Conservative evangelicals will struggle with some of his terminology as he relates it to the church. This, I believe, is because they have not been a part of churches that manifest some of the basic foundational truths of ethics such as community and regard for social concerns. Others in conservative evangelicalism will summarily dismiss Augsburger because of his views on pacifism, which is in many conservative evangelical churches is viewed as incompatible with Christianity. One of my critiques of the book is the weak connction to the kingdom. It is there, but in some of the chapters, you have to look for it pretty hard.
October 5, 2006 at 7:40 pm
I bought “Dissident Discipleship” during my lunch hour today i have already managed to read about 3 chapters. I find this book to support and re-inforce the theme and thesis of another book I just read, “Mere Discipleship: Radical Christianity in a Rebellious World,” by Lee C. Camp.
“Mere Discipleship,” blew my socks off and has completely shifted my paradigms as well as those whom I have persuaded to also read it. After reading this book I felt so empowered and so close to the truth that i also entered the blogosphere. I have had much to say which you will see if you follow the links to my own blog. As I said “Dissident Discipleship” is very much on the same track as “Mere Discipleship”- they are also both published by Brazos Press.
I am looking foreward to devouring Augsburger’s offering..I like what I have seen so far and have much affinity for what he says in the 5th chapter
( I skipped ahead) entitled “The Practice of Resolute Non-Violence” and under the sub heading of “Love Not The Domination System”. Based on what I have read there alone I can already reccomend this book and offer my opinion that every Christian should read it as well as the other book I have mentioned. I believe that the Church in general is bound for a cultural shift on par with the reformation…these books are part of the vanguard of that revolution.
October 10, 2006 at 3:32 pm
Scott
Enjoy the read! There are many things in the book that are challenging to me in a good way. I like how he talks about community (stubborn loyalty) and humility. I learned a great deal about myself in those chapters, much of it was, well quite frankly tough to take. The chapter on serenity was tough for me in another way because it challenged my doctrinal beliefs (esp. 92 on spark of divinity in us all). This was also good for me because it forced me to listen and disagree without summarily dismissing the whole book. I agree with your assessment of the 5th chapter. I think it is something that all Christians should read and consider, especially in light of the past conditioning that held Patriotism/Military support=Good Christian (perhaps a bad analogy but you get the idea).
October 26, 2006 at 6:01 pm
Yes, the book has taken me even further down the path of discipleship. I love the tri-polar spirituality concept. I can now accurately describe what “Mere Discipleship” taught me and define the place I have reached in my spiritual walk. I never knew what I was missing….I just felt that something WAS missing. I am thankful for this book and am anxious to apply what I have learned to my life.
December 27, 2006 at 11:33 pm
abell2live,
I really liked the radical nature of Dissident Discipleship, but I had some problems with Augsburger’s distinction between Spirituality 2.5 and 3.0. First, he promotes Spirituality 3.0 as superior without making that argument Biblically or philosophically. Second, he writes abstractly about the differences but provides few concrete examples (besides nonviolence) of how a life lived in Spirituality 2.5 looks different than one lived in Spirituality 3.0. And what does it really mean to “love God only as I love my enemy”?
Any insights?
December 28, 2006 at 1:51 pm
lukeprog
I agree with you. I really liked certain aspects of the book while in other places I thought he over stated his case. Spirituality 2.5 and 3.0 was one of those areas of IMO over statement on his part. I understand (at least I think) what he is trying to distinguish, but he does not fully develop it. The distinction as he states it, seems further improbable for the reader when he primarily see 3.0 exemplified in his own tradition (Anabaptist) while most other evangelical positions are relegated to 2.5 implicitly. I believe he is trying to distinguish between those who would say “to love my enemy is to love God” is my life (3.0) vs. “to love my enemy is to love God” is part of my life (2.5). As I worked through the book, I found this paradigm to be true for community, service, etc. It seems his primary critique of 2.5 spirituality is the compartmentalization they allow into their lives (i.e. I can love my enemy in some sense (desire for conversion?) and still war against him). I would whole heartedly agree with him on this point. However I think he could have made his case stronger with more examples outside his tradition, in perhaps utilizing the Emergent/Ancient Future church in certain areas.
December 28, 2006 at 5:17 pm
Ah, yes, the compartmentalization allowed by 2.5 spirituality. That is a good reminder, but golly I wish he would’ve spent more time on this subject. Thanks for your thoughts.
Leave a Reply